 | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —Steve Lane
|
| | | (...) I like the tie-ins, except "Harry Pooper". Star Wars has made Lego "cool" in some quarters. They're a great reason for people who already have sufficent Lego to buy more. They just need better tie-ins. "The Matrix" Lego would have been cool. (...) (19 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) How long has the current version of the RCX been around? (...) What would you want to see in an online forum? What would it include that's not available here (LUGNET) and/or on LEGOfan? Steve (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —Steve Lane
|
| | | | | (...) What I meant was that Lego should improve the Mindstorms product line and create an official forum targeted as the same demographic they're selling Mindstorms too and not afols. Lugnet will always be much better than that, but it's probably a (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —Mr S
|
| | | | Personally, I believe that the discussions on business models for TLG are a bit off key. Lego already has solid products, and sells to a defined market segment. Their bread and butter product lines sell because of novelty in many cases. Those film (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —Matthew Davidson
|
| | | | | (...) I thought about bluetooth, but I personally feel 802.11 would be better. I bought a Roku Soundbridge new for around $125 and that included a WiFi card. (...) Is there a composite wish list for a next-generation RCX-like microcontroller (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —steve
|
| | | | | | (...) There have been dozens and dozens of discussions here about what might or might not make a great RCX replacement - I don't think there is much chance of it happening - so it's really a waste of time to discuss it. (...) Right. The trouble is, (...) (19 years ago, 30-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —danny staple
|
| | | | While I personally love to see that, I just dont see them putting their neck out on that one. As stated before, we (AFOLs and advanced users) are barely a blip on the register of the bean counters, and it is to them that any business development (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —dan miller
|
| | | | this may sound a bit dumb, but give it a few seconds of consideration (and try to supress your own prejudices): One of the problems with being an AFOL is that the bright, happy colors of Lego pieces make everything look like a preschool toy. If I (...) (19 years ago, 1-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —Steve Lane
|
| | | | (...) That's a very interesting point "should Lego allow others to make Mindstorms pieces". It would mean a big culture change. On the one hand they could lose sales to an outside company, but on the other hand they could generate sales by selling (...) (19 years ago, 2-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot —John Barnes
|
| | | | (...) Steve brings up some very interesting points here, some of which I am already familiar with. As far as TLG is concerned, I talked with folks like Brad and Jake some years ago about the company's attitude toward my plans for making and selling (...) (19 years ago, 2-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
