Subject:
|
Re: RIS 2.0 Problems
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:47:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2636 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Thomas Johnson wrote:
> I stand by my statements. Robolab does not encourage poor programing practice.
> Neither does NQC encourage it. These tools are neutral and can be used well or
> not.
Tom, I'd like to hear your comments in response to my "robolab as a tool for
teaching programming post" earlier today. The gist of it starts about here:
http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/?n=23705
In short, I disagree with you regarding whether Robolab is neutral with respect
to good programming practices. But lets continue the conversation, if you'd
like, over there.
John Hansen
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RIS 2.0 Problems
|
| Steve, I stand by my statements. Robolab does not encourage poor programing practice. Neither does NQC encourage it. These tools are neutral and can be used well or not. Further, Robolab skills become LabVIEW skills--skills that are often required (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
