Subject:
|
Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:14:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3265 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Baker wrote:
> But not one single eensy-weensy bit of NQC ends up in the robot - it's
> just a tool. This is the HUGE misunderstanding that people seem to have.
> NQC *isn't* somehow loaded into the robot.
That doesn't matter. What matters is what people _perceive_... which is
why non lego tools shouldn't be allowed. People who have more of a
computer background would _tend_ to develop better robots, and would
also tend towards using tools like NQC, and to less experienced people,
the competitive advantage that these people have which is actually
solely a result of their differences in personal background would
instead get focused towards the difference in which tools were used.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
| (...) OK - so there are two horrible implications in what you say: 1) People who have more of a mechanical background are allowed to have a huge advantage - but people who have more of a software background have to be constrained to prevent them (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
| (...) But not one single eensy-weensy bit of NQC ends up in the robot - it's just a tool. This is the HUGE misunderstanding that people seem to have. NQC *isn't* somehow loaded into the robot. Are you telling me that I can't use any TOOLS that (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
