To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 23629
23628  |  23630
Subject: 
Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:24:27 GMT
Viewed: 
3224 times
  
If one allows things that are not produced or distributed by lego, then
why can't one use non-official sensors?   Why can't one drop the entire
default firmware?  Heck, why does a person even have to use the RCX in
the first place and not a more robust microcontroller?

The actual solution is for Lego to make more of an effort at producing
platform independant development environments of their own, not for FLL
to allow NQC.



Message has 3 Replies:
  Highschool FLL competition
 
A tiny bit off topic, but of interest to people in this thread. I mentioned in a previous post that we've been running a highschool FLL pilot program the last couple of years. Well FIRST and LEGO have decided not to support the highschool program. (...) (20 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
 
(...) I don't follow your logic. Are you saying that any change to the rules to allow non-LEGO programming environments that target the standard LEGO firmware (including ones that they encourage people to use by selling tutorials for them on their (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
 
(...) The difference is a really bright line. All of the examples you quote are to do with non-standard things ending up inside the robot. NQC DOESN'T end up inside the robot. Using NQC instead of RIS is no different from using a pocketknife to (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
 
(...) That's not a good reason at all. Robolab was not actually produced by LEGO. They happen to sell it on their website and they "partnered" with the actual producers of the software, Tufts University and National Instruments. They also happen to (...) (20 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)

114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
28 minutes ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR