Subject:
|
Re: RIS 2.0 Problems
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:18:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2666 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Thomas Johnson wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I stand by my statements. Robolab does not encourage poor programing practice.
> Neither does NQC encourage it. These tools are neutral and can be used well or
> not.
>
> Further, Robolab skills become LabVIEW skills--skills that are often required to
> get a (non-software) engineering degree. Hardly an "educational dead end"
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom
Sitting back watching, I have to delurk and make the point that in ROBOLAB 2.5.4
there is a new function called "Upload RCX Code". With this function you can
download someones "spagetti" code to an RCX and then upload it back to your
computer where it will be formatted neatly. Depending on how complex the program
is it may need a little tweeking. It is a very useful function in a classroom of
kids.
One other way of using this function is if you have a NQC program downloaded
into an RCX you can then upload it and convert it into ROBOLAB because they both
use the same firmware.
If you are wanting text based language in ROBOLAB, set your COM port to 'Text'
and download you program.
Benrard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RIS 2.0 Problems
|
| Steve, I stand by my statements. Robolab does not encourage poor programing practice. Neither does NQC encourage it. These tools are neutral and can be used well or not. Further, Robolab skills become LabVIEW skills--skills that are often required (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
