 | | Re: RIS 2.0 Problems - Low Level Languages? —Mark Bellis
|
| | | (...) Reminds me of BBC micros, where the most useful BASIC command was the open square bracket to go into assembler! Do you have facilities to program the RCX in assembler or hex? I'm interested in a lower level language so that I don't have to (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RIS 2.0 Problems - Low Level Languages? —Michael Obenland
|
| | | | | (...) Sure, that can be done. Take a look at brickOS. With brickOS as operating system you can write your programs with gcc. So you can write c, or mix c with assembler via asm{} or you could write plain asm routines. (...) But you have to learn H8 (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: RIS 2.0 Problems - Low Level Languages? —Steve Baker
|
| | | | (...) You could certainly use assembler (and presumably hex) using brickOS but I don't think it's possible with the standard firmware. Of course a true 'Real Programmer' would just dump the firmware altogether and write to the bare metal. (...) (...) (20 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RIS 2.0 Problems - Low Level Languages? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Or if you really wanna reduce the memory use, compile your program as firmware that you can send using firmdl3 (like the BrickOS kernel itself, or LDCC). Although I must admit that BrickOS, if you use the kernel compile defines, can be made (...) (20 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
