 | | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB —Claude Baumann
|
| | | (...) Ultimate is close enough to standard ROBOLAB to allow easy programming too. Ultimate certainly is not reseved for high specialists. (...) Right. The gain is : memory, speed and control; the loss is : longer download speed. (...) So did I. But (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB —Jerry Kalpin
|
| | | | | Thanks, Claude, for the detailed response and thank you, Larry Whitman, for the following link: (URL) ...and the 303 page Robolab Manual. Jerry (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB —John Hansen
|
| | | | (...) I think Ultimate Robolab sounds very cool. Unfortunately, I think some Robolab users may be confused by the name and think that their Robolab programs will be completely reuseable in Ultimate Robolab. As far as I can figure this is simply not (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB —Claude Baumann
|
| | | | (...) Yes and no! In fact, the name Ultimate ROBOLAB was chosen together with the father of ROBOLAB Prof Chris Rogers. This might be a bit confusing as to compatibility. But compatibility there is: 1. Most of the "modifiers" like "Red (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
