Subject:
|
Re: best way to ignore sensors??
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:22:48 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Mr S <szinn_the1@yahoo+StopSpammers+.com>
|
Viewed:
|
878 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.robotics, Juan Rodriguez wrote:
> > Hi. i am interested in programming my RCX to • ignore one sensor port once
> > another has been activated. I haven't found a way • to do this with RIS Software
> > so I wa wondering what other programming language • would allow me to do this with
> > the least amout of hassle? Any advice would be
> greatly appreciated. Thanks.
This sounds like you have a sensor monitor running
continuously, and there is code in the monitor.
Perhaps if you set up the sensor monitor to only
modify a variable rather than cause the RCX to do
things, then your other code could monitor the
variable when and if it needs to, acting on the value
of the variable in relation to your other monitor code
etc.
Cheers
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: best way to ignore sensors??
|
| (...) This is what I interpreted it to mean. I would advise him to use a language like NQC, or another code based programmer. The GUI at last view does not containt much, if any support for variables at all. It could be done in the GUI by having a (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: best way to ignore sensors??
|
| (...) All right, if you're going to keep reposting your question until somebody answers... ;) Any other programming language will allow you to do that just fine. You write the code that makes the RCX do something in response to sensors; you can (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
