Subject:
|
Re: Brute Force Brick
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 03:58:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
884 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Ralph Toepper wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
>
> > We've talked about having firmware that
> > could be compatable with the RCX op-codes,
>
> ...you should make it look like an RCX with expanded sensor and
> motor capabilities to us users. This means, that you should adapt the RCX
> op-codes as a virtual machine
That's pretty much what I was thinking.
> Beside the expanded sensor and motor capabilities we need bigger arrays (as
> you give us) but the RCX datalog too (at least).
Think about the size of the datalog you could record with 1MB of RAM! :)
> A 38.4kbps UHF radio link is nice, but it disallows us doing Brian Davis pings
> if an infrared interface is missing.
I don't think the hardware's going to change. But the loss of the IR LED is not
such a big deal, if you consider all the other I/O.
Thanks for the input.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brute Force Brick
|
| (...) so you are a real investigator of the kind. (...) I think, before checking out the market chances of your indeed incredible and usefull machine, you should make it look like an RCX with expanded sensor and motor capabilities to us users. This (...) (20 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
