Subject:
|
Re: The LEGO Level
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 03:22:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1047 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Mark Haye wrote:
> Jerry,
> This level is a great piece of LEGO engineering, and your website
> is full of equally impressive projects.
>
> I also attempted to build a self-leveling platform for my model
> of the Kennedy Space Center Crawler/Transporter:
>
> http://members.cox.net/markhaye/ksc_ct.html
>
> One advantage of my solution is that it is entirely LEGO
> (well, some of us consider that an advantage).
> But, your solution is vastly more compact and probably
> quite a bit more accurate. Well done.
>
> Mark Haye
I think that detecting 'plumb' is an attractive alternative to detecting
'level'. They both have the same problem: the need for settling time. Also, a
plumb detector must have damping or the pendulum effect can go on forever.
Thanks for your good words!! We LEGO builders live for ...applause and curtain
calls.
Jerry
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The LEGO Level
|
| Jerry, This level is a great piece of LEGO engineering, and your website is full of equally impressive projects. I also attempted to build a self-leveling platform for my model of the Kennedy Space Center Crawler/Transporter: (URL) advantage of my (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
