 | | Re: The latest rage in pneumatic computing —Andy Gombos
|
| | | Using the paper tape idea - the input consists of a row of holes and spaces. The spaces are large enough for a piston end to get through, and change some part of the meachine on the other side (to store state). Output could be a piston with a sharp (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The latest rage in pneumatic computing —Mark Tarrabain
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, but that would be the whole idea. Otherwise it would be easy.. just knock out axles where you want a 1 and leave 'em in where you want a zero and let a human being read it. But I was thinking of a situation where the output could be fed (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The latest rage in pneumatic computing —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) Oh... When you mentioned axles and holes I instantly flashed on the axles *always* being in the holes, just pressed to one side of the brick or the other. That way you don't have to make a machine that can insert axles in holes. By pressing (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
