 | | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - replacement for RCX
|
|
(...) Please, no. HandyBoard is fine, but it is 20+ year old technology. If you can all hang in there another two months the answer will be JCX: (URL) KBytes SRAM (this can be used just for heap - working data space) 512 KBytes to 2048 KBytes Flash (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - replacement for RCX
|
|
I haven't really looked into HandyBoard, since I found it to complicated compared to the RCX. 20 year old tech works fine on the Space Shuttle and other NASA projects BTW. JCX seems nice, but $500 for a replacement is getting a bit steep for the (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - replacement for RCX
|
|
For under $100 one can tap into more power and features from the guts of a laptop that has a cracked screen. Sorry to rain on the JCX parade, but I don't see $500 worth of features or value for me. (...) works (...) allowed (...) allowed (...) CPU, (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RCX: JCX Super replacement, HandyCricket, New Technologies
|
|
(...) It's a fine board (and my 286 PC/AT was wonderful in its day too). I have tremendous respect for Fred Martin and have had the pleasure of meeting him briefly. He actually is no longer focused on the Handy Board but is working with something (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
