 | | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? —PeterBalch
| | | | John (...) to (...) starts (...) True. I was assuming that this was an alternative to the RCX. I'm not a Lego purist; in fact, I'm working on a totally non-Lego expandable system. For various reasons, I'd decided not to go down the route we're (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? —John Barnes
| | | | | (...) Yes, I agree with that completely. I use them in all sizes for just about everything. The bit of "the scheme" I am trying to find a small single chip solution to is not the digital end of a comms link. As you point out, that's easy. The small (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | |
