 | | Save the RIS!
|
| This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| In lugnet.robotics, Timothy Schroeder writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| "Bluey" <Wolf_and_eagle@spam...yahoo.com> wrote in message news:H9HpMG.DJs@lugnet.com... This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| In lugnet.robotics, David Koudys writes: In lugnet.robotics, Timothy Schroeder writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | RE: Save the RIS!
|
| -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of David Koudys Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:31 AM To: lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com; lugnet.robotics.rcx@lugnet.com Subject: Re: Save the RIS! In (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:18:16PM +0000, Bluey elucidated: (...) Gah! Do we really need this to go to the list? Dale (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| Hi, (...) I would advise running a web page for this. I really don't want to receive one mail per list member who makes an entry to the list... assuming that anyone interested enough in the RCX to subscribe to a Mailing List (or read the (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| Stephane Simard ha scritto: In lugnet.robotics, David Koudys writes: In lugnet.robotics, Timothy Schroeder writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| In lugnet.robotics, David Koudys writes: In lugnet.robotics, Timothy Schroeder writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| In lugnet.robotics, Paul Kleniewski writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
