 | | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? —Mark Riley
|
| | | I see no reason why TLC couldn't just continue to manufacture RIS 2.0. Why continue with R&D to develop 3.0 if 2.0 is more than adequate to stimulate young minds into considering a career in engineering? 3 sensor inputs and 3 motor outputs are more (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | (...) I agree. One thing I thought is that, Keep the RCX and offer an expanded version of the Technic Control Center. It currently has three motor controlls via the pad keys and plays back movments. I'm making a giant robot that has 6 motors on just (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? —Jordan Bradford
|
| | | | Yes, you are on to something. Many industrial robots are "programmed" in much the same way. The operator "teaches" it which movements to make using manual controls, and then the robot can do those movements over and over again without error. In the (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
