Subject:
|
Re: A Generic Idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 23:49:50 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail*AntiSpam*.net>
|
Viewed:
|
710 times
|
| |
|
|
Rob Limbaugh wrote:
> So, the questions (to me) become:
> 1) Does a cordless phone transceiver pair have the ability
to handle the data rate of a USB device?
The most bandwidth you can get out of a regular analog telephone line is 56Kbaud.
*PROBABLY* you'll do no better than that with a cordless phone. There is no reason
for them to overdesign the radio system to be better than the telephone network - so
we can *GUESS* that it'll do no better than 56Kbaud.
According to www.usb.org, 900kb/s is the peak rate. But most
devices are designed to use only 30 to 40% of that. However, it's
way more data than you can get down a phone line.
So, unless the cordless phone electronics are *WAY* over-designed,
I don't think it's gonna work.
> 2) If answer above is yes, then is it possible to create a wireless USB
> interface using a 2.4GHz transceiver pair from a cordless phone?
I don't think so.
> Then again, why not buy a wireless TCP/IP survellience camera and
> wireless microphone and use TCP/IP through IR to the RCX?
Yes - or (as I suggested a day or two ago) get the teeny-tiny colour
camera from www.thinkgeek.com for $120 which broadcasts an FM NTSC
television signal. You can pick that up using a cheap TV card for
your PC and frame grab the results. The camera is *tiny* and runs
on a single 9 volt battery.
--
---------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------
HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com>
HomePage : http://www.sjbaker.org
Projects : http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net
http://tuxkart.sf.net http://prettypoly.sf.net
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
