 | | Problem with auto-steering mechanism. —PeterBalch
|
| | | Steve You shouldn't have a differential. The front bogey can rotate about its vertical axis about (let's call it) the steering shaft - which also doubles as the drive shaft. The two wheels on the bogey are on a solid axle. The idea is that it's (...) (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Problem with auto-steering mechanism. —Steve Baker
|
| | | | (...) Yes - I realised that and posted a photo of the new mechanism yesterday. (URL) The front bogey can rotate about its vertical axis about (let's call it) (...) ...well...I used a single wheel. (...) Right. The problem with making it work (...) (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problem with auto-steering mechanism. —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | (...) I've been following this thread with interest. Is there a proper name for this mechanism to help with my search on the net? Chris (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Problem with auto-steering mechanism. —Chris Osborn
|
| | | | | | (...) They've always been labeled as "Bump-and-Go" for as long as I can remember. (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problem with auto-steering mechanism. —Chris Osborn
|
| | | | (...) Yes, exactly, look at Mark Tilden. His "robots" don't do anything more than these ancient Bump-and-Go style toys, and people think he's a genius! He demonstrates how he can break legs on his "robots" and they keep on trying to work, but so (...) (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
