Subject:
|
RE: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:26:03 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Rob Limbaugh <rlimbaugh@IHATESPAMgreenfieldgroup.com>
|
Viewed:
|
875 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks for the alert, but the batteries don't pose a threat if used properly.
Just don't incinerate or eat them.
Maybe it was Li-ion batteries I was thinking of that lose their charge sitting
dormant...
In any event, does anyone have specific and useful information regarding
alkaline, NiCd, NiMH, Li-Ion, and rechargeable alkaline?
Weight, cell voltage, charge time (under proper charging conditions), discharge
time, effects of storage, cost, average number of full charge cycles, run-time
under load (i.e. 3 motors, 2 active sensors, one passive sensor, and IR
communication)?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Meszaros (ETH) [mailto:Laszlo.Meszaros@eth.ericsson.se]
> Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 10:05 AM
> To: Rob Limbaugh
> Cc: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
> Subject: RE: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX
>
>
> Guys, NiCd batteries come with cadmium, a metal causing
> several serouos diseases. For this reason, NiCd batteries
> are going to be removed from commercial use in a number of
> countries (Germany has just announced its plan). Personally
> I do not support manufacturers by purchasing such cells.
> NiMH, besides its almost double capacity, are much less
> harmful. Even better are the Li-ion cells that show much
> less of the suspicous "memory effect".
>
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
