To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 18307
18306  |  18308
Subject: 
Re: Several hardware questions.. Laser link Hardware expansion n' more
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 21:54:18 GMT
Viewed: 
647 times
  
I'm not sure I follow you here.

If you're talking about switching inputs using an output (lower the 'speed' of port A to change the relay controlling the input for port 1) well, then Yes, it can be done.

However, the problem suggested below comes from using a rotation sensor.  If you 'turn off' a rotation sensor, any changes made during that time are ignored.

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: lego-robotics@crynwr.com (MiB)
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 19:52:39 GMT
To: lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com
Subject: Re: Several hardware questions.. Laser link Hardware expansion n' more


could not the voltage level deside what relays should be turned on for
instance on port 1?
Now it might go wrong if the battery turns to be bad.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Hassenplug" <hassenplug@mail.com>
To: <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: Several hardware questions.. Laser link Hardware expansion n'
more


I've been working on just such a robot.  (two RCXs, two rotation sensors, • four light sensors, and two touch sensors)

Currently, my biggest problem has been communicating between RCXs.  I keep • getting collisions with my messages.

I've had to limit the messages to one direction.  That seems to be working • better.

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Barnes" <barnes@sensors.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 12:17:12 GMT
To: lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com
Subject: Re: Several hardware questions.. Laser link Hardware expansion n' • more

problem. As an example, if you are building a tracked platform with left • and
right side rotation sensors, the easiest way to partition the task is to • use
two RCXs communicating via their infrared ports set to low power. One RCX • is
set up as being responsible for platform movement (controlling the main
drive motors and handling the rotation sensor inputs to close the tread
speed loops) while the other takes care of the higher level control and
navigation functions. This simplifies the communication tasks to motor
control commands being sent one way and motor status reponses being sent • the
other. Low level bump sensor overrides then also route into the motor
control RCX. It often seems to me that six sensor ports and six motor • ports
seems more than twice as capable as three and three.

JB



--
_______________________________________________
Talk More, Pay Less with Net2Phone Direct(R), up to 1500 minutes free!
http://www.net2phone.com/cgi-bin/link.cgi?143



--
_______________________________________________
Talk More, Pay Less with Net2Phone Direct(R), up to 1500 minutes free!
http://www.net2phone.com/cgi-bin/link.cgi?143



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR