Subject:
|
Re: Light Sensor help
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 06:05:01 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
T. Alexander Popiel <popiel@(NoMoreSpam)wolfskeep.com>
|
Viewed:
|
704 times
|
| |
|
|
In message: <GuBp2H.AHx@lugnet.com>
"Kevin L. Clague" <kevin_clague@yahoo.com> writes:
>
> I did some similar tests and found similar results. The results held up
> well up to about 3 tasks, but by the time we were doing work in all 7
> tasks, the execution time went up. I say about 3 tasks, because I did
> this research over 9 months ago.
Hrm. Looks like I need to be more thorough with my multi-task
timing tests... my results (which seemed to show only one task
getting run in any given timeslice) differ from yours. Unfortunately,
I didn't keep good notes of all my measurements, so I'll just have to
redo a bunch of it. Nuisance.
With any luck, I should have a confirmation on one theory or the other
(only one task per timeslice vs. all tasks per timeslice) within a
day or three.
- Alex
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Light Sensor help
|
| "T. Alexander Popiel" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:20020409200644....eep.com... (...) time (...) loop (...) I did some similar tests and found similar results. The results held up well up to about 3 tasks, but by the time we (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
