 | | Re: RIS parts questions
|
| (...) That didn't change. (...) 2.0 software is better (...) didn't change (...) Nothing. (...) I don't think there's a 1.0 downgrade option :-), I think the difference is only a few pieces. You can compute the set difference from the Peeron (...) (22 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: RIS parts questions
|
| (...) interesting, but would it really be useful? how many sets would it make sense to compare like this? Dan (22 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: RIS parts questions
|
| (...) Maybe only a few. But if you could also add sets together and then compare the results to another set that could be useful. You coud add together 3 or 4 sets, and see if you'd have the pieces needed to build some 5th set that you don't (...) (22 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | RE: RIS parts questions
|
| (...) The Parts Catalog software (see lugnet.db.inv) can both read HTML pages saved from Peeron and compute set differences - but you need Win2K William (22 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | RE: RIS parts questions
|
| (...) now *that* would be cool (22 years ago, 30-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: RIS parts questions
|
| (...) I just bought a RIS 1.0 Set on EBay and although shorter, I think the constructorpedia is better in RIS 1.0. It has less in actual bots to put together but explains more of the basics, fir instance the difference between grey & black pegs. . (...) (22 years ago, 30-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: RIS parts questions
|
| If you're interested, since it's now no longer available, I've posted scans of the Constructopedia 1.0 at (URL) Wilcox ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Gentilin" <gentijo@eyecatching.com> To: <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> Sent: Saturday, March (...) (22 years ago, 30-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: RIS parts questions
|
| (...) What is the difference? (22 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
