Subject:
|
Re: How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:05:59 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Jona <JJEFFORDS@AMERITECHnospam.NET>
|
Viewed:
|
1944 times
|
| |
|
|
Miguel,
The smallest design for an adder-subtracter I have seen online is by Denis
Cousineau. You can find it at
http://prelude.psy.umontreal.ca/~cousined/lego/1-Varia/adder/adder.html .
However, you should know that his design, and one that he links to have
inspired myself, and a few of my robotics friends to play around with the
adder-subtracter. We have reduced it in size quite a bit, and I think that
if you just play with all of your options, you are sure to find a solution
for your application.
Good luck,
Jona
----- Original Message -----
From: "miguel agullo" <technicpuppy@yahoo.com>
To: <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:40 PM
Subject: How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
> Hi all,
>
> I've got an intriguing little MOC coming up that hopefully will interest
> both the technicheads and the robogeeks. It is a tracked vehicle with a
> twist, but you'll have to wait to learn all the details ;-)
>
> In the meantime, here is something I could use some help on. For precise
> operation, I'm using a dual differential drive as described by the Ferrari
> brothers in their book. My setup is farily different from theirs, mostly
> because I need to save space. I've uploaded to brickshelf 2 dats and 4 POV
> jpegs of how it looks right now. You might want to take a look.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=13856
>
> (For those of you who, like me 4 months ago, don't know what a double
> differential drive does, it's a mechanism that mechanically links 2 motors
> to an axle so that one motor rotates both wheels on the ends of the axle • in
> the same direction and the other motor rotates them in opposite • directions.
> In practice, this means that a vehicle fitted with this drive will go in a
> stright line if one of the motors is used or rotate in place if the other • is
> activated. If both motors are activated, rotation still occurs.)
>
> So, a couple of things about my design. First, it's meant to be as small • as
> possible. Second, the two input axles (yellow and green in the jpegs) • rotate
> the output axle (blue) at different speeds - the green one uses a double
> bevel 20 tooth gear/24 gear crown combination for reduction, the yellow • one
> a 8/24 tooth combination. I have not attached motors to this drive, but
> nothing seems to break or even creak when I rotate the axles with my • fingers
> in any direction simultaneaously.
>
> Anybody can come up with a more compact design? Can anybody solve the dual
> speed issue? I could add studs in width (distance between wheels) and one
> stud in height to what already rises above the wheel axle (and maybe • another
> stud below). Height is critical, but losing some length is even more so.
>
> OK, I hope you enjoy it and come up with some ideas.
>
> Chao for now!
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
