 | | Re: All-around-the-robot bump detection —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | (...) I haven't actually tried this, but I can hardly imagine that the pressure generated from just squeezing one small part of the tube is sufficient to extend a cylinder and press a touch sensor. The pressure generated will probably just "vanish" (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: All-around-the-robot bump detection —Dennis Parker
|
| | | | How 'bout this as an alternative. A flexable containment, possibly the moderate diameter rubber tube, inside which are two circuits. One is a continuous metal strip which runs along the inside edge of the outside wall of the tube. The second is a (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: All-around-the-robot bump detection —Kerry Garrison
|
| | | | There is an example on the net somewhere of building it just like this using the bend sensors ripped out of a Mattel PowerGlove. -Kerry -----Original Message----- From: Dennis Parker [mailto:dparker@onr.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 1998 6:55 AM (...) (26 years ago, 19-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: All-around-the-robot bump detection —bertalan
|
| | | | to Dennis Parker's point OK so you get this tube wired up to act as a switch. What's the energy drain on your batteries? What are the voltages required to exceed the limit value of the actuator? It sounds more accurate than an air filled tube (...) (26 years ago, 20-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
