 | | Re: Programming the RCX...
|
|
(...) I have to disagree. I personally have three fairly significant robotic applications in the field which were developed using a visual programming language. I must confess that the language was not purely visual. The software IC components were (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Programming the RCX...
|
|
(...) Connecting data paths between conventionally programmed chunks is not the same thing as "programming". (...) Yeah - *theoretically* - but in practice, people don't do that. (...) But it's still not a visual programming language...it doesn't (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Programming the RCX...
|
|
(...) National Instruments would disagree with you. Their product Labview is a tremendous success, requiring a marketing machine the size of Unigraphics'. Plenty of "real" world programs have been built with Labview. For those not familiar: Labview (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I wish Lego made an "Anti-Backlash Gear"
|
|
Rrrrrrrrr..... (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Chat server is up! (was: Need for chat server?)
|
|
AH! :) ok, thxs. I'll be hanging around, time permiting :) mc. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
