|
|
 | | Re: Curved Feet
|
| Andy, I think the curved foot concept is the wrong direction for a two-legged mechanism. The few simple two-legged mechanisms I have seen rely on two feet, each with a VERY large footprint. Each footprint is large enough to support the weight of the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Curved Feet
|
| (...) What about using #32250 liftarms? They may not be large enough for your needs, but here's a pic: (URL) Regards Micah J. Mabelitini - LUGNET #918 The University of Kentucky SECC Middlesboro Academic Skills Resource Center accutron@kih.net - (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Robotics beginner question
|
| (...) Well, if you want to keep the Lego 'firmware', you are pretty much stuck with 'NQC' (Not Quite C) which is a small C subset that generates the same kind of special bytecode as Lego's own graphical programming language. This is a relatively (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Curved Feet
|
| (...) Andy: That's an interesting site. I can't think of a way to make curved feet, BUT there is the 1x6 sloped beam. as seen here: (URL) was thinking that if you used two of these with the "studs" pointing down, you might be able to replicate that (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
| Perhaps you should let John Barnes answer for himself. Different people have different approaches here. Dave Baum, for example, has spent huge amounts of effort on NQC and has been quite happy for people to use his invention. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
