 | | Re: AT-AT —Andrew Lipson
| | | | (...) Very badly. If you figure out a mechanism for yourself it will almost certainly be better. Mine falls over every few steps. (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: AT-AT —Steve Baker
| | | | | (...) So did mine when I first built it. You have to be VERY careful. I checked carefully and discovered that I'd made THREE mistakes while building it. When I corrected them all, it walked beautifully except for the fact that it only goes about a (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | RE: AT-AT —Tilman Sporkert
| | | | | (...) Exactly. Mine walks very nicely, and has not fallen over once. Otherwise it's pretty boring however, because the MicroScout is extremly limited in its capabilities. The best program I found is the one that makes it walk when you shine a light (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: AT-AT —Tim Milligan
| | | | | do you have any diagrams online? The thing is, we don't have the set. But we're making progress. We now know how the legs work. it's the gears that are a problem (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | |
