 | | Re: A neat idea for touch sensors
|
|
(...) make that four, one more than the number of sensors (...) It's on Michael Gasperi's site ((URL) Schumm has figured out how to orient the wires to allow two or more Touch sensors to be hooked in series to create the AND function. Here is his (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: NQC versus Lego RCX Code Speed
|
|
(...) (URL) Is a note I posted a while back on pbForth speed. It really is very fast - not as quick as legOS, but fast enough for what we're doing. In fact, NQC and native firmware is fast enough - we just don't have enough variables.... As a point (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Vision command and Mac
|
|
I've seen no discussions of drivers either, if any finds out anything...please post. Thanks, Doug (...) Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at (URL) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC versus Lego RCX Code Speed
|
|
(...) This is correct. (...) Hehe :) Yes, this is correct. LegOS is also faster for some other reasons- it samples the sensors at a much faster rate than the standard firmware, so legOS programs can react much more quickly than standard bytecode (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: NQC versus Lego RCX Code Speed
|
|
Thanks very much, everyone, for the detailed answers. I suspect that, due to the huge performance gain I seem to get using NQC (in one observable area: touch sensor response time using two touch sensors on two separate ports), that the RCX Code (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
