|
|
 | | Re: Modelling boolean gates with trains
|
| (...) If NOT is reversing direction, than 1 is forward and 0 is back. (Or the other way around; whatever.) But I'd be curious to hear how you envision more complicated logic! (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | RE: R: good sets?
|
| Heh, heh. I'm at my office ... with my Lego robotics stuff. :Þ Doug Wilcox Senior Web Developer iMcKesson Provider Solutions Group-Needham 160 Gould Street, Suite 130 Needham, MA 02494-2308 Phone: 781.453.2900 x 237 Fax: 781.455.7990 e-mail: (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Modelling boolean gates with trains
|
| If by 1 your mean TRUE and by 0 you mean FALSE, and given that in Boolean logic TRUE = NOT FALSE, then two conclusions from what you have said is "train on the line" = "reversed" "train not on the line" and "train not on the line = "reversed" "train (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Lego Mindstorms in Swedish television
|
| (...) Or their website: (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Modelling boolean gates with trains
|
| Okay, this might be totally impossible (or insane or banal), but has anyone modelled boolean functions on a train layout (System or Duplo)? At the moment I'm thinking "train on the line"=1, "not on the line"=0. NOT could be done by reversing the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.trains)
|
|
