 | | Re: Autonomous Robot —Ian Warfield
|
| | | I thought of another possibility for robot coordinate recognition. It's rather unorthodox, however, and requires some special equipment and setup to make it work. Still, in the interest of creative discussion... Building off the base station idea (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Autonomous Robot —Steve Baker
|
| | | | (...) Clever! ...Food for thought! The only snag I can see is that when the first laser is being acquired, both the tower and the robot have to spin. It might take a LOT of rotations for them both to happen to be pointing in the right direction for (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Autonomous Robot —Ian Warfield
|
| | | | (...) Thanks! (...) Not if you used an omnidirectional laser sensor. Picture, instead of only one face of paper, a paper cylinder. There would be a tube of paper mounted on top of a circular LEGO piece (or *pieces* arranged in a circle) with a paper (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Autonomous Robot —Mario Ferrari
|
| | | | (...) both (...) for (...) one (...) on (...) paper (...) Now (...) paper (...) Wherever (...) I find Ian's proposal about the laser tower very clever. The only bad point about using an omnidirectional laser sensor on the robot is it can't get any (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
