Subject:
|
Re: Antenna Bumpers/Insects
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 5 Dec 1998 06:09:22 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
stephen p spackman <stephen@acm=AntiSpam=.org>
|
Viewed:
|
1106 times
|
| |
|
|
Hey, I vote that gait discussions are definitely *on* topic - a lot of
my thought about LEGO robotics in the past has related to mobility!
But on a different tangent - what would be needed to run a neural net on
an RCX? What kind of processing model is involved when you say "a
hundred node net"?
Last time I checked in on neural nets (now too long ago) I conculded
that they were basically fraudulent in that they modeled no time domain
phenomena and could not be used in a control situation (while bioneural
computation seems to be mostly *about* timing). Evidently that
situation's changed - what are these things we're discussing?
*Would* they fit (not in nqc, but in something else)?
stephen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | RE: Antenna Bumpers/Insects
|
| <SNIP> (...) Because of the limited on-board computational resources, IMHO you would have to use offline simulation to train the neural network and then embed the trained net, provided of course, that the resulting weight and bias matrices and the (...) (26 years ago, 5-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: Antenna Bumpers/Insects
|
| insects can indeed move backwards, although perhaps not in the way you're imagining. --- more info than you probably care to know about roaches --- most hexapod robots hard-code a "tripod gait" on their robots, where the first (prothoracic) and last (...) (26 years ago, 4-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
