Subject:
|
RE: Duplex Comms with RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Apr 2000 18:29:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
676 times
|
| |
|
|
> I think this is an important subject. I am personally grappling
> with multiple RCXs and I'm obviuosly not alone.
Ummm, removing their batteries takes away their power, making them
fairly docile grappling opponents....
> The vitally important thing about whatever scheme is adopted is that
> it needs to be really simple. This keeps the code simple and debugging
> manageable. I have worked on network systems before that hand around
> the master "token". They typically suffer from "freezes" when the current
> master drops out.
>
> The nice thing about using a single polling PC master is that it does the
> lions share of the work but it has more CPU resources and is easier to
> debug on. And it can more easily tolerate RCXs going in and out of range.
My current consulting assignment is a single-master / multi-slave control
system that sits on a 485 protocol.
> What the scheme doesn't address, and which perhaps it should is what happens
> if a pair of RCXs wish to dialog out of range of the others and the PC.
> This is not a far-fetched wibni (wouldn't it be nice if) but a very real
> requirement in my particular case in which I want to build a dual RCX
> controlled rover which relies on RCX to RCX comms.
Now I'm going to throw out a wild idea. Why are we stuck on the PC as the master?
In my application, a PC is used to download config info to the master and slave
devices. The PC is treated like just another slave.
We need to develop a scheme where one RCX is the master, and other devices
can be connected as slaves. This gets rid of the tower as an obstacle...
Cheers,
Ralph Hempel - P.Eng
--------------------------------------------------------
Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at:
<http://www.hempeldesigngroup.com/lego/pbFORTH>
--------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: rhempel at bmts dot com
--------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: Duplex Comms with RCX
|
| I think this is an important subject. I am personally grappling with multiple RCXs and I'm obviuosly not alone. The vitally important thing about whatever scheme is adopted is that it needs to be really simple. This keeps the code simple and (...) (24 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
