Subject:
|
RE: Making Lego airborne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 16:39:10 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Morgan, David <david.morgan@rez.#avoidspam#com>
|
Viewed:
|
1754 times
|
| |
|
|
A quick search on "Google" for the word dirigible brings up 4800 matches,
the third one being:
http://www.britannica.com/bcom/eb/article/3/0,5716,120013+11,00.html
BTW: Google is available at www.google.com
-----Original Message-----
From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
Of Ram Meenakshisundaram
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 09:16 AM
To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
Subject: Re: Making Lego airborne
Matthew Teets wrote:
> I think your best bet might be to supplement the lift by possibly making a
> dirigible. I agree with the statement that Lego's are heavy and motors • are
> weak, so this would seem to be the best suggestion. You could still have • it
> RCX controlled, but that would free the motors to supply directional • movement
> rather than compensating for lift as well, probably easing the programming
> factor.
Here comes a stupid question: What is a dirigible???
Ram
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
