To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 10530
10529  |  10531
Subject: 
Re: Sensor Reliability
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:58:42 GMT
Viewed: 
1541 times
  
John Barnes <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message
news:3.0.32.20000207084755.00f142b8@mailserver...
1. For active sensors like the light sensor, "Lego" don't regulate
the power to the LED. So it's output amd thus the overall
response is sensitive to battery voltage. Tut tut!

The RCX power signal is not regulated but LEGO has a current regulator that
is shared between the phototransistor and the LED in the light sensor.  It's
a interesting combination, the brigher the light entering the
phototransistor the dimmer the LED will be.  If you shine a laser pointer
into the phototransistor, the LED won't get enough current to even light up.
I've never noticed that the LEGO light sensor was all that sensistive to
battery voltage.  More on the LEGO light sensor @
http://www.plazaearth.com/usr/gasperi/light.htm



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Sensor Reliability
 
I have also noted these effects and I don't think they are due to the wire length. There are two things doing this; 1. For active sensors like the light sensor, "Lego" don't regulate the power to the LED. So it's output amd thus the overall response (...) (25 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR