| | Re: Robots In Love? Michael Naunton
| | | Ok, I read it. The notation is extremely strained, and redefining X^Y to mean Y*X' (where X' is the underlying concept representing X) does not help. On the plus side, at least you figured out that orthogonal concepts need to be represented as a (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | Re: Robots In Love? David Leeper
| | | | | Hi Michael, Wow! I never really expected anyone to read it! Thanks! I've read Minsky's "Society of Mind" and was generally unimpressed with it. It's not so much that I think anything he said was wrong as much as it seemed dated to me (the book was (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Robots In Love? Philippe Jadin
| | | | | (...) Hopefully he didn't wrote it in "1984" Phil (25 years ago, 1-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | |