Subject:
|
Re: I'm sick of nqc
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Jan 2000 07:59:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
742 times
|
| |
|
|
alex wetmore wrote:
>
> From: <MeTzBoi3104@aol.com>
> > Is there anything else better than RCX code but simpler than nqc?
>
> Not really.
>
> Spamming the list with variations of the same question over and over and
> over again isn't going to get you very far. You'd be better off to applying
> the same energy to fiddling with NQC. Start with very simple programs, such
> as one that just turns on a motor for 20 seconds and then turns it off
> again.
>
> alex
You might be interested in checking out the following two links:
http://www.umbra.demon.co.uk/gbp.html ("The next step up from Lego's
visual programming system for MindStorms without having to program in a
text based programming language")
http://www.netway.com/~rmaynard/html/brainstorm.htm (UCBLogo for the
Mindstorms brick)
I'm not making any promises on their ease of use, but at first glance,
they both appeared to be easier than learning C (or NQC).
> > Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: I'm sick of nqc
|
| From: <MeTzBoi3104@aol.com> (...) Not really. Spamming the list with variations of the same question over and over and over again isn't going to get you very far. You'd be better off to applying the same energy to fiddling with NQC. Start with very (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
