 | | Re: What to do if not selected for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) I agree. Simply put, more types of parts to work with increases the realm of possibility. Kev (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Java for Robots (was NXT and bluetooth enabled phones)
|
|
Bruce (...) Ermm. How much does a NXT have? No doubt you think that everyone should buy one of your systems but far more NXTs will be sold. Lookng at the posts on other robotics newsgroups, I reckon that over 90% of home-made robots do not have (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java (or other langs) for Robots
|
|
Dan (...) (at (...) Wow, that's nice to hear. Brooke's philosopy deals very neatly with levels 1 and 2 but how do CMU say we should integrate the high-level stuff into it? That has always been my difficulty with subsumption architecture. It's fine (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT release date.
|
|
(...) Even though I do wish all of the above conjecture was true, I think it might be just a slip on the LEGO SHOP website. I agree that the August date was probably chosen to be inline with the next school year and that there is a strong (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What to do if not selected for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) I don't think it requires less creativity, but I do think it reduces the creative possibilities for those that don't already have a collection of studded technic bricks. There are some things that studless just doesn't do very well, and having (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
