|
|
 | | Re: BricxCC release 3.3.7.6
|
| small suggestion: when you've a syntax error in NQC, it goes like this - error is reported - you correct the error - recompile the source - code is downloaded - error message disappears In my opinion, the last 2 actions should be the other way (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
| | | | | Re: Vision Command XP
|
| (...) I wrote to Lego and received an XP patch for Vision Command on a CD for free. (22 years ago, 11-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Will the educational arm of Technic and Mindstorms continue, at least?
|
| In lugnet.robotics, Ross Crawford wrote: -snip->> But has there been any official word on whether or not at least the (...) Before TLC drops the educational division, there's the question of what will happen to FLL which has grown rapidly not only (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Will the educational arm of Technic and Mindstorms continue, at least?
|
| If Technic continues, replacing the controller and motors with better options won't be hard. The real problem will be the lack of standardization as members of the group experiment. I know someone will post a really cool design based on controllers (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: NQC's future
|
| (...) Here's a suggestion/question: is it possible (either in the current incarnation or a future one) for NQC to use FastTimer() as a source for events? Timer() works, but not (it seems) FastTimer(). (22 years ago, 11-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
|
