 | | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
(...) There's no fault involved from my perspective. The idea is to have fun. You can't do that without some sort of risk (at least I've never experienced 'fun' without some risk). The problem comes when people mix emotion/ego with curiosity. Very (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
Ah, I do suspect that my data was a little out of date. However the information I see ((URL) Word ".doc" file, or (URL) ) list the housefly at 10^5 or 100,000, to 10^6 or 1 million neurons. This is a little bigger than "400 neurons." In fact the (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
(...) That was true 20 years ago. A housefly's brain contains just 400 neurons. Your PC can easily simulate a 400 neuron neural network at faster update rates than biological neurons. The problem isn't the raw computational power. ---...--- Steve (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
(...) True. (...) I was just picking on you since you've spent your day publicly humiliating people (dripping with sarcasm :^) I have plenty of silly and/or stupid ideas..... Some of them lead to really great ideas. (...) No doubt. Flaws are a (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC's future
|
|
I would like functions to be able to return something other than zero. (If there's a way to do this (other than global variables) already, please let me know!) (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
