|
 | | Re: Universal Remote vs Lego remote
|
| Yes it works! I was curious and have done this last week... The 'learning' remotes are capable of remembering the codes needed for your IR bricks. You can programm the RCX to sent a code (message) and let the remote learn this. Later on your RCX can (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |  | | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| (...) I'm having trouble downloading the patched firmware. Robolab doesn't have a .lgo file anywhere in the program directory structure, so I don't have a filename to replace with the patched file. Downloading in Robolab seems to work, but I see no (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |  | | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| (...) Wow, that's far more than I expected! And thanks for the detailed explanation. I may have to look at it tomorrow - my daughter's birthday is today. <snip> (22 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |  | | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| (...) My arguments would be: 1. The firmware/sensor arrangement is _broken_. Fixing it should be legal. 2. The FIRST rules permit using different firmware implicitly, because they permit using RIS or Robolab, which requires different firmware. 3. (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |  | | Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| Hello Dick, Looks great, but it doesn't seem to work well here: - counts up 2 by 2, but counts down correctly one by one - loses count, especially when counting up. My tests were done with a brand new, unmodified rotation sensor. I mounted a wheel (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |