 | | Re: Are there GOTO statements in NQC?
|
|
(...) I'd love to take up the personal challenge of eliminating your need for goto. Can you share your code with me? Email would be fine. Kevin (22 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Are there GOTO statements in NQC?
|
|
(...) As a general rule I do not use goto's because I don't have a need for them. I've coded so many LOC in my life that the "if then else" structure of modern language was a step up from where I started. :^) The original BASIC and FORTAN had gotos (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Are there GOTO statements in NQC?
|
|
(...) I'm probably in the minority here, but I'm going to come right out and say that goto's are not a bad thing, contrary to popular belief. In fact, I find it rather pompous when I come across admonishments in textbooks that there is no valid (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Are there GOTO statements in NQC?
|
|
(...) NQC has supported the goto statement since version 2.5a3 (which was released a long time ago). (...) Nope. It's already there. John Hansen (22 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Are there GOTO statements in NQC?
|
|
(...) Y'know, I really ought to check the latest version before saying these sorts of things. It appears that goto has actually been implemented since the last time I fiddled with NQC. Sorry for the misinformation. - Alex (22 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
