 | | Re: Multiplexing 4 touch sensors on an RCX input port
|
|
(...) I have tried this method too, and as you say in your text, it is plagued by the rubber contacts whose value goes down as more pressure is applied to the switch. I measured resistance of several touch sensors while applying a very progressive (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: Multiplexing 4 touch sensors on an RCX input port
|
|
(...) Ian, Great to see that you are having success with pbForth! I have a couple of questoins: 1. Which version are you using? 2. Are there any features you REALLY wish were available? 3. Do you have any stories or code to share? Ralph ---...--- (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiplexing 4 touch sensors on an RCX input port
|
|
(...) It works very well for me, with the variation that I use home-made touch sensors that are actually microswitches embedded into 2x2 blocks. That does mean you might need to debounce in software, but normally I don't bother since the inertia of (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiplexing 4 touch sensors on an RCX input port
|
|
I have done work in this area. I chose to solve the problem to permit 4 touch sensors to be pressed in any arbitrary combination with high probability of getting the answer right :) A simple R, 2R, 4R, 8R scheme will do. I chose R = 40.2K. This is (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiplexing 4 touch sensors on an RCX input port
|
|
(...) Good analysis. Series can work quite well as long as you know that the touch sensors are touched mutually exclusively, but you are right parallel doesn't work well. I remember trying to come up with good resistance values to do parallel, and (...) (22 years ago, 9-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
