 | | Re: RCX remote and Spybotics
|
|
I have noticed that they do interfer - mostly just 'blocking' signals from one or another. I haven't done any experimenting with changing frequencies on the spybots or tried to work around tis problem. I would still get a remote for the RCX - it (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Air transportation of RCXs etc
|
|
(...) That's just nonsense. I've put my Laptop, PDA, digital camera, USB memory stick, digital watch, calculator/alarm-clock and my kid's Game Boy through the airport scanners dozens and dozens of times without harm. Many of my co-workers fly more (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX Voltage Question
|
|
(...) When you connect two devices across a source of electricity, you can do so either in series or in parallel. In parallel: +---...---+---...---+ | | | | | | Battery Motor Motor | | | | | | +---...---+---...---+ In series: +---...---+ | | | Motor (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | NQC 2.5 a4 released
|
|
I have been working a little bit on Spybotics support in NQC. There is a new version of NQC and some updated documentation at: (URL) information about Spybotics can be found here: (URL) Baum (23 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Air transportation of RCXs etc
|
|
(...) Why? If you make it clear that it's *not* a bomb.... A demonstration should be sufficient. (...) This is probably what would happen. Still, silicon chips are delicate, and the CPU could probably be damaged. (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
