 | | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) I think you need a MUCH bigger area under the craft. If all the motors and stuff on top weighed (say) 100 grams, and you have just 16cm diameter skirt then you need a pressure of: 0.1 / (PI x 0.008 x 0.008 ) kilograms/square meter ...in order (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) So is Hans Madsen on this list? I'm always skeptical of things that are just throwaway lines like that...was this pure lego? How much cheating was involved? There was a couple of photos of a lego helocopter that could really fly on the list a (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) We aren't interested in power, we're interested in moving a volume of air. They are very fast, high rpm. Trade off rpm with suitable gearing. You may need two or more (which is why small may be better). I've never used them myself except for (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) Get rid of this fixation with 'lift own weight' (you're -completely- ignoring the -primary- factor of time). Consider the exhaust of a car, pump it into a bag and you can lift the car to change the tire but you can stop the car by simply (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) There's an echo in here ;)...you'll get to the answer faster if you'll think of mass and force instead of weight. (...) Which is where the ratio of the input plenum to the skirt (the output plenum) comes into play. (...) No, that's a function (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
