 | | Re: legOS 0.2.6 installation problems - a better way?
|
|
(...) Thanks Max, in running the instructions mentioned above, I entered the following in a bash shell, with the following responses. Sorry about the volume of this but it is all there. Any answers would be appreciated. $ cd /legos-0.2.6 $ make (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) LOL! No ! I myself am doing tests with a non-LEGO one also. it would be nice if it could use a LEGO motor... and material usually found in every home, so anyone could build one... if we ever find a way to make it possible. (...) Yep. Do you (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
if i will use non lego or znap propeler will you disqualificate me? :) be cause IMO some kind of turbine is needed here i'll try to do it tonight (23 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Motor Control Register (0xf000)
|
|
The lugnet registration takes forever :) After reading this post a light went on in my head. A few weeks ago I wrote a multi-threaded program for the RCX (about 7 threads, each running an endless loop). When I added one more thread, the robot (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
pixel wrote (...) yup, I confirmed that yesterday :/ though now I have a nice ZNAP micro ventilator, for the hot summer, ehehe now... let's see what happens tonight, with the 9v ungeared LEGO motor and a non-LEGO propeller together with an "air (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
