|
|
 | | Re: Need to compare
|
| (...) A straight tri-wheel like that can't climb anything higher than half it's height though. If you are really after something that'll climb TALL steps, then it has to have something high up at the front to grab the top of the step with. Even a (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Need to compare
|
| Ok, so, the complete description.... It's not really a competition, but a project for students in my university... We have to build a bot with LEGO mindstorms... This bot has to be able to follow a line on a ground made in steel. This line goes (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Need to compare
|
| (...) Oh - that's a pain. (...) Well, I guess it depends on how rough the terrain in general is. If it's a flat, smooth surface with just one 5cm hole - then practically any vehicle with (say) 6 wheels will drive across it like it wasn't there. (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | 2 rcx's
|
| What would happen if you took a wire from a sensor port on one rcx and connected it to a motor output on another rcx. Would this be a viable way to communicate with 2 rcx's if they could not be position for IR communication? My thought was that you (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Need to compare
|
| (...) I like the tri-wheel design. If you make if big enough it shouldn't have any trouble. Something like this (or bigger): (URL)For the step, it begins at 1cm and it will be increased until no véhicule is (...) The advantage of an ODEX design. (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
