|
|
 | | Re: RIS 2.0
|
| (...) Did your nitpick need to be posted to everyone? I was more happy to read about a possible sale than your complaint. Couldn't you have sent your comment as a private e-mail? (Yes, I know I become a hypocrit(sp?) with this post...) Eric (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: RIS 2.0
|
| Did that really need to be annouced to everyone?... i mean, it's not that many people care about the sale you found. Couldn't you just post in the califoria section. geez... (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: RIS 2.0
|
| The Target in Watsonville, CA has the RIS 2.0 on sell for 139.99, they also have alot of other sets for 30% off. The sale ends Saturday. Gary Don't forget to look at my brickshelf pictures: (URL) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Target Sale
|
| The Target in Watsonville, CA has the RIS 2.0 on sell for 139.99, they also have alot of other sets for 30% off. Gary Don't forget to take a look at my brickshelf pictures: (URL) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Lego patents
|
| (...) Not at all. What I'm saying is that just putting a bunch of LEGO bricks together does not qualify something as a device which can be patented. Now if that LEGO construction can remove cancerous tumours without leaving any scars.... now that's (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
