 | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
|
(...) Why bother? All you get is abuse if you do. I observe that in the opinion of Richard Marchetti, I am a "nut" for having the audacity to compare the two sets. At least if you post reviews in loc.au, you don't get abused for having written it. (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
|
(...) I've kind of noticed this trend over the last 6-12 months, and I'm not sure if I'm alarmed by it or not... More and more I'll find very interesting posts in the lugnet.loc.* and lugnet.org.* groups that really "belong" (or I should say "would (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
|
(...) Actually, I also called you "crazy Kerry" -- but I meant it in a friendly way. I call everyone here a "lugnut" including myself (for reasons that should be obvious). If you buy lego as an adult I should think being called a "nut" is just par (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
|
(...) Then let 'em come & abuse me for such unnecessary cross-posting 8?) (...) And I didn't thank you for the review either! ROSCO (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
