Subject:
|
Re: New Dinosaur set reviews, 6721, 6722
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.reviews, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 May 2001 03:47:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3171 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.reviews, Jeff Stembel writes:
> In lugnet.reviews, Bradley Dale writes:
> > What is the mosasaur's alternate model?
>
> Mosasaurus can be made into Dimetrodon, Postosuchus, and Iguanodon, although
> none of the alternates really look very much like the creature they are
> supposed to be.
Horrible alternates, agreed. "Iguanodon" might pass if they called it a
plateosaur, definately better than the real set of it! But this set looks like
it has very good parts!
> Tyrannosaurus Rex can be made into Spinosaurus, Ouranosaurus, and
> Parasaurolophus, but again, they don't look much like they should.
Well, they're better than I expected!
> Styracosaurus can be made into Centrosaurus, Triceratops, and Camarasaurus, • and
> they DO look like they should, yay! :) Except for Camarasaurus, which should
> have a different head.
Those are good, but simple. I like the Camarasaurus.
> Brachiosaurus can be made into Diplodocus, Plateosaurus, and Plesiosaurus.
> Plesiosaurus is okay, but Diplodocus looks bad to me, and Plateosaurus is
> horrible. The neck is too long, and the forelegs are way too small.
"Plateosaurus" reminds me of Tanystropheus- http://www.pterosaurs.net/tany.html
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Dinosaur set reviews, 6721, 6722
|
| (...) Mosasaurus can be made into Dimetrodon, Postosuchus, and Iguanodon, although none of the alternates really look very much like the creature they are supposed to be. Tyrannosaurus Rex can be made into Spinosaurus, Ouranosaurus, and (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
