To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.reviewsOpen lugnet.reviews in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Reviews / 632
631  |  633
Subject: 
Re: Lego Studio Steven Spielberg Moviemaker set Review
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.reviews, lugnet.org.ca.vlc, lugnet.robotics.vc
Date: 
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:36:55 GMT
Viewed: 
5484 times
  
In lugnet.reviews, Dean Husby writes:
My first impressions of the (1349) Lego Studio Steven Spielberg
Moviemaker set. • ...
In point form the good points are:
-Good Interface and a good host of editing options and special effects.
-A nice selection of building parts and characters.
-Good backdrops and some very good tips and tricks.
-A fun and inventive manual.
-Capability to record audio tracks from audio CDs
-Software can automatically update itself from the Web site.
-Lego Cam can be used as a standard Windows video device.

And the bad points...
-Terrible image quality (Artifacting)
-Misleading clips as samples.
-Desyncing audio from the video.
-Lack of any preferences for viewing and/or exporting movies.
- Inability to add external video footage


In closing, I feel that unless the above disappointing issues are
addressed, users will be sorely disappointed in their movies and will be
returning this product to the stores for a refund.  If you are looking
for a USB camera with Lego studs I strongly suggest picking up the
Vision Command instead.  You get the same camera but for much less cost.

As I find out anything new I will update this review.  If anybody has
any similar or dissimilar reports please voice them as these are my
findings alone and should not be taken as absolute.

Dean

Well I agree with your list of + and - but I disagree with your conclusion.

  This is a great TOY ... my 10 year old son *LOVES* it; he comes home from
school with ideas for clips and spends the rest of the day on them.
He's found that the 'artifacting' (he calls it 'the little dots') can
be improved dramatically by increasing/adjusting the lighting of scenes
which is typically the way to remove graininess.
  The quality of the clips he's done have improved.  The simplicity of the
user interface and the simple to understand tutorials have allowed him to
make several 3 minute movies (a star wars one, a dino one, a TWISTER one)
and he's added 'bloopers' at the end of his films which are amusing.
  The simple stop frame animation makes it seem like the minifigs are
really alive and  ... he loves it !
  So ... although there are the negatives you mention, I think they are
because the studio is intended to be a TOY and not a pro studio for LEGO
animators.
  My son's excitment over making his own movies that he is very proud of
showing is, to me, the best review any TOY can get.
  So, although, the system has traded off 'picture quality' and features
for simplicity and TOY 'playability' by young users, I think the tradeoff
is well worth it.
  If you want a professional quality video studio, you might want to look
elsewhere. If you want a really first class fun TOY that will excite the
imagination of a young film maker, this is 'imagination catalyst in a box'.

-- carlo barrientos  (Dad of a legomaniac)



Message is in Reply To:
  Lego Studio Steven Spielberg Moviemaker set Review
 
My first impressions of the (1349) Lego Studio Steven Spielberg Moviemaker set. (As of this date there is no Newsgroup for this type of set. Cross posted to lugnet.robotics.vc) Purchased at Toys R Us for $250 Canadian. First, let me say that I used (...) (24 years ago, 30-Oct-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.org.ca.vlc, lugnet.robotics.vc)  

18 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR