|
|
 | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
| Hi, Considering I bought my 6098/6091 at half price, I am still dispointed despite the save, the set it poorly structured and when trying to see its features I always seem to knock of half the castle, It is very unstable also, making it even worse, (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
| (...) it would (...) Actually I did buy my 6091 at half price! I had resisted it at full-price because I didn't think it was worth the money. Besides which, at half-price, it was less than AUD100, which is a psychological barrier for me. (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
| (...) Hey, I only buy if I think it's worth it now. That set taught me a lego lesson about quality. At $90 USD, the set did not contain the needed quality. But I probably would not have returned it except for the missing pieces, which gave me an (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
| (...) Then let 'em come & abuse me for such unnecessary cross-posting 8?) (...) And I didn't thank you for the review either! ROSCO (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
| | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
| (...) A nut? There exists a long tradition of proving that old is better than new... (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) So, you bought it, built it (& discovered missing parts), modified it, displayed it (for a week), let other people play (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
